The Use of AI

Students may use AI programs (e.g. ChatGPT) to help generate ideas and brainstorm. However, they should note that the material generated by these programs may be inaccurate, incomplete, or otherwise problematic. They should be aware that this use may also stifle their independent thinking and creativity.

AI tools like ChatGPT are designed to assist humans with their work. However, it is important that students understand the appropriate use of AI to avoid academic misconduct. The following guidelines apply to the use of AI at VGO:

• If utilized, AI should be used to enhance and supplement academic work, not to replace it.
• If allowed as a reference by teachers, students must properly cite any information obtained from AI.
• Students must not use AI to obtain answers on assessments.

While AI can provide a wealth of information and insights, it is important to remember that it is a machine and not a human expert. It is not capable of independent thinking or making judgments based on personal experiences, cultural contexts, or ethical considerations. Therefore, it is important, if used, to use AI as a complementary tool to academic work, and not as a replacement for one's own thinking and analysis.

Moreover, academic work involves developing essential skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and effective communication, which cannot be fully developed by relying solely on AI. Engaging in independent research, reading, writing, and discussion with peers and teachers are crucial components of academic work that should not be overlooked or replaced by technology.

Students may not submit any work generated by an AI program as their own. If students include material generated by an AI program, it should be cited like any other reference material (with due consideration for the quality of the reference, which may be poor). The reference citation should be (This was generated utilizing Chat GPT (AI) July 11, 2023). Teachers should have clear guidelines about the use of AI as a reference source for each of their classes.

In conclusion, while AI can be a valuable resource in enhancing academic work, it should be used as a supplementary tool, rather than a replacement for independent thinking.